Non-probability sampling represents a **group** of **sampling techniques** that help researchers to select **units** from a **population** that they are interested in studying. Collectively, these **units** form the **sample** that the researcher studies [see our article, Sampling: The basics, to learn more about terms such as **unit**, **sample** and **population**]. A core characteristic of non-probability sampling techniques is that samples are selected based on the **subjective judgement** of the researcher, rather than **random selection** (i.e., **probabilistic methods**), which is the cornerstone of **probability sampling techniques**. Whilst some researchers may view **non-probabilit**y sampling techniques as inferior to **probability** sampling techniques, there are strong **theoretical** and **practical** reasons for their use. This article discusses the **principles** of non-probability sampling and briefly sets out the **types** of non-probability sampling technique discussed in detail in other articles within this site. The article is divided into two sections: **principles of non-probability sampling** and **types of non-probability sampling**:

There are **theoretical** and **practical** reasons for using non-probability sampling. In addition, you need to decide whether non-probability sampling is **appropriate** based on the research strategy you have chosen to guide your dissertation.

Non-probability sampling represents a valuable group of sampling techniques that can be used in research that follows **qualitative**, **mixed methods**, and even **quantitative research designs**.

Despite this, for researchers following a **quantitative research design**, **non-probability sampling techniques** can often be viewed as an **inferior alternative** to **probability sampling techniques**. Non-probability sampling techniques can often be viewed in such a way because units are not selected for inclusion in a sample based on random selection, unlike probability sampling techniques. As a result, researchers following a **quantitative research design** often feel that they are **forced** to use non-probability sampling techniques because of some inability to use probability sampling (e.g., the lack of access to a **list of the population** being studied). However, this is not the case for researchers following a **qualitative research design**.

When following a **qualitative research design**, non-probability sampling techniques, such as **purposive sampling**, can provide researchers with strong **theoretical** reasons for their choice of units (or cases) to be included in their sample. Rather than using probabilistic methods (i.e., random selection) to generate a sample, non-probability sampling requires researchers to use their **subjective judgements**, drawing on **theory** (i.e., the academic literature) and **practice** (i.e., the experience of the researcher and the evolutionary nature of the research process). Unlike probability sampling, the goal is not to achieve **objectivity** in the selection of samples, or necessarily attempt to make generalisations (i.e., statistical inferences) from the sample being studied to the wider population of interest. Instead, researchers following a qualitative research design tend to be interested in the **intricacies** of the sample being studied. Whilst making generalisations from the sample to the population under study may be desirable, it is more often a secondary consideration. Even whether this is desired, there are additional problems of **bias** and **transferability** (or **validity**) [see the section on Research Quality for more information on **research strategies, sampling techniques, and bias**].

Non-probability sampling is often used because the **procedures** used to select units for inclusion in a sample are much **easier**, **quicker** and **cheaper** when compared with probability sampling. This is especially the case for **convenience sampling**. For students doing dissertations at the undergraduate and master's level, such **practicalities** often lead to the use of non-probability sampling techniques.

As mentioned, for researchers following a quantitative research design, non-probability sampling techniques can often be viewed as an inferior alternative to probability sampling techniques. However, where it is not possible to use probability sampling, non-probability sampling at least provides a viable alternative that can be used. As such, it ensures that research following a **quantitative research design** is not simply abandoned because **(a)** it cannot meet the **criteria** of **probability sampling** and/or **(b)** meeting such criteria is **excessively costly** or **time consuming**, such that it would not be sponsored. This could significantly diminish the potential for researchers to study certain types of population, such as those populations that are **hidden** or **hard-to-reach** (e.g., drug addicts, prostitutes), where a **list of the population** simply does not exist. Here, **snowball sampling**, a type of non-probability sampling technique, provides a solution.

Non-probability sampling can also be particularly useful in **exploratory research** where the aim is to find out if a problem or issue even exists in a quick and inexpensive way. After all, you may have a theory that such a problem or issue exists, but there is limited or no research that currently supports such a theory. Where your main desire is to find out is if such a problem or issue even exists, the potential **sampling bias** of certain non-probability sampling techniques can be used as a **tool** to help you. For example, you may choose to select only those units to be included in your sample that you feel will exhibit the problem or issue you are interested in finding. If this problem or issue does not exist even in your **biased sample**, it is unlikely to be present if you selected a relatively **unbiased sample** (whether using another non-probability sampling technique; or even a probability sampling technique). This would help you to avoid a potentially more time consuming and expensive piece of research looking into a potential problem or issue that actually doesn't exist. It may also be considered an **ethical approach** to finding out whether a problem or issue is worth examining in more depth, since fewer participants are subjected to a research project unnecessarily.

If you are considering whether to use non-probability sampling, it is important to consider how your choice of research strategy will influence whether this is an appropriate decision. Even if you know that non-probability sampling fits with the research strategy guiding your dissertation, it is important to choose the appropriate type of non-probability sampling techniques. These non-probability sampling techniques are briefly set out in the next section.

There are five **types** of non-probability sampling technique that you may use when doing a dissertation at the undergraduate and master's level: **quota sampling**, **convenience sampling**, **purposive sampling**, **self-selection sampling** and **snowball sampling**.

To get a sense of what these five types of non-probability sampling technique are, imagine that a researcher wants to understand more about the career goals of students at a single university. Let's say that the university has roughly 10,000 students. These 10,000 students are our population (* N*). Each of the 10,000 students is known as a unit (although sometimes other terms are used to describe a unit; see Sampling: The basics). In order to select a sample (

Quota sampling

With

**proportional quota sampling**, the aim is to end up with a sample where the**strata**(**groups**) being studied (e.g., males vs. females students) are**proportional**to the population being studied. If we were to examine the differences in male and female students, for example, the number of students from each group that we would include in the sample would be based on the proportion of male and female students amongst the 10,000 university students. To understand more about quota sampling, how to create a quota sample, and the advantages and disadvantages of this non-probability sampling technique, see the article: Quota sampling.Convenience sampling

A convenience sample is simply one where the units that are selected for inclusion in the sample are the

**easiest to access**. In our example of the 10,000 university students, if we were only interested in achieving a sample size of say 100 students, we may simply stand at one of the main entrances to campus, where it would be easy to invite the many students that pass by to take part in the research. To understand more about convenience sampling, how to create a convenience sample, and the advantages and disadvantages of this non-probability sampling technique, see the article: Convenience sampling.Purposive sampling

Purposive sampling, also known as

**judgmental**,**selective**or**subjective sampling**, reflects a group of sampling techniques that rely on the**judgement**of the researcher when it comes to selecting the units (e.g., people, cases/organisations, events, pieces of data) that are to be studied. These purposive sampling techniques include**maximum variation sampling**, homogeneous sampling,**typical case sampling**,**extreme (or deviant) case sampling**,**total population sampling**and**expert sampling**. Each of these purposive sampling techniques has a specific goal, focusing on certain types of units, all for different reasons. The different purposive sampling techniques can either be used on their own or in combination with other purposive sampling techniques. To understand more about purposive sampling, the different types of purposive sampling, and the advantages and disadvantages of this non-probability sampling technique, see the article: Purposive sampling.Self-selection sampling

Self-selection sampling is appropriate when we want to allow units or cases, whether individuals or organisations, to choose to take part in research

**on their own accord**. The key component is that research subjects (or organisations)**volunteer**to take part in the research rather than being approached by the researcher directly. To understand more about self-selection sampling, how to create a self-selection sample, and the advantages and disadvantages of this non-probability sampling technique, see the article: Self-selection sampling.Snowball sampling

Snowball sampling is particularly appropriate when the population you are interested in is

**hidden**and/or**hard-to-reach**. These include populations such as drug addicts, homeless people, individuals with AIDS/HIV, prostitutes, and so forth. To understand more about snowball sampling, how to create a snowball sample, and the advantages and disadvantages of this non-probability sampling technique, see the article: Snowball sampling.